Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Need Company Slogans Landscape

The last order

Among the few precepts on which you can oggettivamentefondare the charisma of a good leader is one of the 'last order routine of the day. " It is a practice too often sottovalutatanonostante be able to produce extraordinary benefits tradatore interaction and employee wages.

The longstanding problem of motivational support aldipendente a fixed salary has often been resolved or partially resolved through the use of the system or result in approvvigionale applicazionedi with a mixed system. The primary economic incentive works almost always underestimated if mapeccheremmo apportomotivazionale produced by the charisma of a good leader and conseguenterisparmio loss resulting from less need for monetary incentives aldipendente a fixed salary. The practice of the last order for this purpose can be thought of a tool in the management dellacondotta next to the indispensability of an effective leader. It is to give an order of routine that the employee perform as salariatodebba operazionedella last day before leaving the workplace . The nature of the taleordine routine not affattocasuale. It should have a use or a determination by the caposuccessiva hours of work and the employee prior to quellosuccessivo. Here are some examples.


The last order of the day from routine partedel landlord to his home would be: "And before Dianda, every day, prepares a tray of fresh fruit and let infrigorifero. "Then when the landlord will consume the fruit and shells ... this is not the affairs of the home the next day will ilvassoio vacuum and will seek to fill it for the next evening.
The last order of the day routine delcapoufficio employee might be, " And before you leave every night to leave the report of day on my desk. "Nothing matters Sepoi the boss will read it or not, just move it from the center dellascrivania the pillow on the sofa or register to convince impiegatoche the report has been thoroughly studied in the evening.

examples of excellent recent orders giornatasono multiple and changing contours depending on the tasks of the employee asalario fixed. What matters most is that the nature of the order provides use or a review by delcapo in the period in which the employee does not work . Overifica such use must be shown the next day in the eyes of the employee, as also described in the examples.

The benefits of this practice are endless. Necitiamo someone. First, the employee generally scarsamentemotivato from fixed salary, will think that his boss read, test, utilizziciò that he has prepared as the last day of the operation as routine ultimoordine of fact. Menoconsapevolmente or more repeatedly and more or less, the employee will return the object apensare order. During leisure penseràall'ambiente work, especially his boss, knowing that his ultimodovere is subject to observation, to use, but in the opinion sapendoquando and not with that outcome. Depending on the charisma of the general good leader, the statodel employee in his spare time will therefore be: quiet, talvoltapensieroso, occasionally worried, occasionally irritable, anxious, very anxious, stressed, traumatically stressed. If the manager has diadeguato charisma, whatever is the condition of the worker, this practice has, however tradipendente a bond with fixed wage to workplace during leisure .

The home of the first example would esseretranquilla because, finding the empty tray every morning claims that the house has eaten padronedi fruits and were satisfied. When the padronevorrà communicate his dissatisfaction, he has only lasciareparte fruit on the tray to cause the resulting preoccupazionenella home. The clerk of the second example, seeing the relazionelasciata moved to the center of the desk the night before, will think that it siastar read by the head in the evening. If the boss does not present any objections impiegatosarà the quieter, but if the boss was not satisfied, would lamiglior opportunity to put employees in a position of inferiority dalsuo early arrival, early morning, at a glance.

Some leaders tend to simulate dissatisfaction constantly to lift the state of stress employees. Ultimately, the state of stress for employees, sullascala quiet-traumatic, tends to align up to be the same delcapo but has the option of lowering their status ditranquillo acting inversely to that of its employees. In any case ... goal dominant praticadell'ultimo order condizionareil routine is dependent, in different degrees of anxiety, thinking about work, suocapo, his duty, even during non-working time . Nell'adeguatolasso time between order execution and confirmation of its adequacy ildipendente will feel on trial, under observation, even when potrebbeessere free to think of something else.

Another positive effect is the result of the practice dell'ultimoordine belief of subordinates that the leader lavoripiù them. The charisma of the good leader will greatly benefit from this practice, even if the order was completely unnecessary and verification does not happen.

This raises the exception of animals of considerable unnumero manage subordinates. A wealthy landlord can having a chef with a handful of servants and certainly can not eat five trays difrutta every night. The order may relate to cook the fruit and LaDonna cleaning the order might be, for instance, let fioresul a pillow of the bed the next morning that it has been evidentementerimosso. A boss may have to do with dozens of employees and nonsarebbe realistic read dozens of reports every night. For example, the secretary could give the order to call the bar angle edordinare a sandwich and a cup of hot coffee to be delivered after the secretary's own lapartenza (nb The good leader always leaves the place last warp and only) .
                                                                                                                                     
praticadell'ultimo The order is often confused with the harmful dell'ordineposticipato . It is expected to occupy the leisure deldipendente so ordered to be held during the organization nonlavorativo. This practice is extremely dangerous and only occasionally good capidall'elevato charisma can afford without provocareeffetti amotivational in employee wage. Absolutely edi most benign effect is rather to be the practice of the last order if benapplicata. It is modular, flexible, free of charge.

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Oj And Cream Of Tarter To Quit Smoking

Elicina? No, thank you! January '11 ♥ ♥

Crema Elicina Forse qualcuno non conoscerà l'esistenza di questa crema a base di bava di lumaca (sì, avete letto bene!) che promette risultati miracolosi contro:



  • Segni dell'acne

  • Cicatrici

  • Smagliature

  • Bruciature

  • Macchie

  • Rughe



Elicina Crema è l'originale crema nutritiva ai mucopolisaccaridi di lumaca che contiene, in forma naturale e biodisponibile, sette degli elementi più importanti per il benessere della nostra pelle (allantoina, collagen, elastin, glycolic acid, protein, vitamins and purifying peptides).
Improves pigmentation spots, with its cleaning action of the pores and consequent return to natural color. Removes dead skin cells, nourishes with natural collagen and elastin, smooths and softens with the help dell'allantoina. Daily use for all skin types and adjuvant treatments for acne, stretch marks, sun spots, wrinkles and scars. The pack of 40 grams is sufficient for applications a month (in smaller areas like the face), allowing you to try with your own eyes his undoubted quality.

Ingredients:
80% Helix aspersa Muller Extract. Paraffinum liquidum. Propylene Glycol. Stearic Acid. Cetyl Alcohol. Sodium Lauryl Sulfate. Diazolidinyl Urea. Methylparaben. Propylparaben. Triethanolamine.

Source: http://www.elicina.it/index.php

Although I was happy and satisfied with my new routine facial , just over a month ago I decided buying a jar 40 g of this cream to fight the small scars that I had around the chin. Since then I've used it every day in the evening after my make-up.
As you can see (and as I had pointed out many girls on facebook fanpage) questa crema ha al secondo posto fra gli ingredienti la paraffina liquida , che è un elemento da un pallino rosso (tutti gli altri ingredienti, a parte il primo, sono rossi e uno solo è giallo). Ma io, imperterrita, ho voluto dare credito a tutte le recensioni positive che avevo letto, visto e ascoltato (persino Clio!) e ho continuato a usarla quotidianamento per più di un mese.


Subito mi sono accorta che la consistenza della crema era molto pesante. Nonostante io ne mettessi pochissima e la facessi assorbire bene, la mattina mi svegliavo con il viso unto e lucido. Sul sito di Elicina consigliano addirittura di usarla al mattino, ma per la mia pelle mista sarebbe un vero disastro!


Dopo a couple of days have appeared in the first pimples. I thought it was normal, write on the site ...

The effect of purifying the snail can sometimes cause the accumulation of impurities under the skin at one point only after which will be released by the exfoliating cream. Please note that this usually happens after the first applications. If the problem persists (after approximately one week) and pimples do not disappear, discontinue use of Elicina.

So I continued to use it every night. But not just the pimples did not disappear, they reappear in unusual areas of the face such as cheeks or around the eyes. Tutti non facevano altro che notare i peggioramenti della mia pelle! Avevo brufoli ovunque, sulle guance, sul mento, sulla fronte, e adesso anche sugli zigomi e sotto agli occhi!


Allora ho cominciato a pensare seriamente che questa crema non facesse per me. Ho la netta, nettissima, sensazione che la paraffina liquida sulla mia pelle annulli totalmente l'azione miracolosa della bava di lumaca. Sì, credo proprio di essere intollerante alla paraffina liquida!


Quindi, l'ho ovviamente abbandonata.


Soltato da due giorni ho ripreso la mia vecchia routine di pulizia serale (olio struccante e crema idratante Sephora) e la mia pelle è già più liscia, meno impura e più luminosa.


The only regret is that he threw € 42. Yes, the snail if they pay dearly!

Full Lentgh Trifold Mirror

How did I remove an article of the Republic

look at what they write today (March 6, 2011) on Republic about Libya (obviously not subscribed Republic of Chesio partial feeds, in every sense ... well, I found the article here ).

Libya was a day of civil war and propaganda, between leinformazioni distributed by the regime diGheddafi and counter insurgents.

[good start. The target and 'immediately clear. The lettoreda indoctrinate and 'left-handed, and' one who reads the Republic but also lacontroinformazione and these days the word "counter" is very dimoda. Thus, 'the bad design (the Gaddafi regime) disseminate propagandamentre young people react with counter-insurgency that is both glamorous . The aim of the first sentence is' let the reader hear the side of twittaroli Soros.]

A Sunday that sees the dawn loyalists Gaddafi in Tripoli to shoot in the air of a successful counteroffensive cheavrebbe reported under the control of the cities east Rais, Misurata, Zawiya, the oil port of Ras Lanuf, after a night of battle, a prelude to the march to Benghazi, the capital of the 'other Libya.

[Fedelissimi and 'a term which bodes sianopochi (loyalists are always a few, by definition). C'e'gia then discover that 'another Libya, a North African Padania has even a novella capital. A Republic, ilsecessionismo Libyan pleases far more 'than the Italian.]

Joy premature. The day, in fact, ends with the NazionaleLibico Council, a body of government and coordination of opposition forces aGheddafi, announcing that not only measures and Zawiya, but all cittàdell'oriente Libya had been "liberated " after rejecting the attacks of the green. And now you point west to recover and return Jawad Bin aminacciare Tripoli.

[In short, Each claims that today has more 'points other. So far the Republic tells us the two versions but does not tell us that most qualesia 'congruent to reality'. We have some source other than quelleparti from the press office of an NGO from Soros? I know, a left ..? The esecutoredell'articolo and does not tell us what 'happened, but it makes us understand that being partebisogna also not knowing. Three lexical choices in this paragraph (released, you point and recover) lead the reader to take sides with the rebels.]



To support its version of events in the evening, the National Council Libicomanda a spokesman in press conference in Benghazi. Persmentire the regime's propaganda and also to reveal the ofa yellow background: the capture of eight British citizens by the rebels.

[In short, the troops of Muammar, instead of weaving astutetrame propaganda of the regime, sparacchiano affettandokebab to the streets of Tripoli and the CNL is of sound and robust communication. What do ribellidopo have lost (or recovered, go to know) the cities' Europe? A bellaconferenza release - there will be 'was an envoy of the Republic? - Smascherarela for regime propaganda, that 'those who facendobaldoria meanwhile, are in place and not think about it a long shot. In contrast, this baby CNLha already 'a magagnetta to solve ... Who were these eight British never?]

event that London would not comment, then finally admits. This is unamissione diplomatic [Ah! Ah! Ah!] escorted by members of the SAS [But it '?], The forzespeciali of His Majesty, entered the country with the aim of contact the Council Libyan National .

The Videogame inspired SAS
you feel the spirit of humanitarianism?


[ie, 'a British military squad entratoclandestinamente on Libya to contact the CNL. But if questipossono hold a press conference, send a spokesman to the right and misses, there chebisogno 'of illegally enter on a war footing to get Uncontacted with them? Mah ..]

"They were entered into modoirregolare without passports - said a spokesman for the CNL, Hafiz Ghoga - we did not want to talk to them, losing a signal to the country. To say that the insurgency and 'spontaneous internal .

[How little you consider your hucksters, amicilettori the mainstream press . Now they realize they, too, up to the office, you are lobotomizzati.Queste once you understand things left were the first considerazioneovvia that the reader was reading at the end. To understand ... a few years ago inbocca This Gogh would put something like this: "They were joined in an irregular manner - says spokesman - and we did not want us to do fare.Libia free!" point. We think you, then, to add that if avevanofatto so 'then they were hard and pure, not tied by outside influences. Inveceoggigiorno I'll just have to explain in detail otherwise there arrivi.Te do so by a spokesman for the Libyan say that all history and 'a messinscenae is reduced to a signal, ie a communicative event, ie that has the propaganda.Che or not, that there is a different version for each of one or editorial, in any case the phrase put into the mouth of this HafizGhoga and 'paradoxical' cause if you think about it, assumes that the rebels giovanisocial spontaneous, at this time of urban riots and military diguerriglia, have a good press office informing them about public umoridell'opinione who has doubts about their spontaneity 'and So, faced to the opportunity 'of a meeting with a delegation militareinglese entered illegally on Libyan soil just to talk to them, a move scelgonodi implement communication instead of a diplomatic meeting. Rifiutanodi negotiate in order to send a signal to the country's sincerity 'of lorointenzioni. E 'illogical, fuck, to me it seems completely senseless. Not loe 'if you evaluate the hypothesis it's all hype or even untotale birth fantasy. tuttoquesto If there 'is not a signal' to the country of Libya, but for you who read , in your use and consumption.]

The eight were signed and sent back to Britain, where ilministro of Foreign Affairs, William Hague, confirmed all, framing the mission in a broader humanitarian erilancia " tried again, bisognarafforzare dialogue."

[for "more 'broad piano umanitario” temo si intendal’invasione della Libia, in questa dichiarazione c’e’ la conferma che gliinglesi l’attuerannoa breve . Non vedono l’ora, d’altronde bisogna rafforzare il dialogo.]

Gheddafi, però, non si lascia sfuggire l'occasione di " svergognare " i suoi nemici. La tvdi Stato diffonde l'intercettazione di un colloquiotelefonico tra un ex ambasciatorebritannico a Tripoli e Mustafa Abdel Jalil, ex ministro della Giustizia libico e attuale capo del Consiglionazionale dell'opposizione. The voice attributed to the diplomat britannicosostiene that their compatriots were caught Inai military experts sent to the rebels.

[conspiracy-tone characterizes gossiparo ilparagrafo dedicated to the best approximation of the truth ', that does not mean puo'non as obvious and implied, therefore, be diminished. We have: shame, spreads (rather than forward), and a pair of interception ex.Il everything to complicate the obvious. The obvious' that a team of British military and 'was sent in support ribelli.Questo and' the problem, my gosh! British military experts sent supportoai rebels. By whom? By the British government? It 'an act of war. Serviziall'insaputa by the government? Then the British government does not count a chip. Fact is that the regular army should be without them and caught - Muammar good - not even lihanno shot. They were returned to the sender. Instead of the gesture far ringraziareper discount Rais, those ungrateful and spontaneigiovani revolutionary (or secession? Do not understand a bat) and external unrelated dainfluenze let us say, really gullible, we also embroider cifanno above and press conferences by inviting reporters and international agencies. That's right ...]

In contrast, during the press conference in Benghazi, a spokesman for the CNL the proposed plan seems to open dalpresidente Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, on a mission of peace that average drill. Proposal in recent days seemed to have been rejected dagliinsorti. "Nobody has ever contacted - Hafiz says Ghoga - what allanostra answer depends on what is offered. And in any case we act for the people . Lerichieste And the people can not be ignored."

[Eye 'cause here comes another key concept. Noiagiamo for the people. That is the revolution not 'in hand to the people but CNLche acts for the people. Gosh, these young marchers square etwittaroli (who knows 'which is struggling to find a connection these days ... oh, no ...' s true, do press conferences) they have made the party and sonoautoproclamati voice of the people and and talk 'then spokesman vocedel people. But who and 'this is said magnanimously willing Ghoga aparlare with Chavez - if it prompts you before course, not like the English - and' ilportavoce whom? The secessionists of Cyrenaica? Muslim Brotherhood (which were once the quintessential bad and yet now, it looks a bit ', have become good)? Or maybe some of the students' anti-system and a network that po'social much like the Western public and particularly ailettori certain editorial guidelines?]

Hafiz Gogh
Still diplomacy. On Libya before the extraordinary meeting of the Heads of Government apprenticeships and next Friday, the capodella diplomacy Catherine Ashton EU sent a mission to Tripoli, four officials, led by the Italian hub Agostino, director of the service since last dicembremanaging EU response to crises. ATripoli arrived today, the mission will start again tomorrow after a series of meetings and inspections field. It dellaprima international mission since the violence. The mission uncarattere technical, aimed at gathering information on site andnot to negotiate with the authorities. Among the objectives, cittadinieuropei check how many are still in Libya, who wish to leave, have a quadropreciso of foreign workers in Libya still wishing andarsene.All 'examination, finally, the demands on the needs of humanitarian aid .

[When I read "humanitarian aid" through my back a brividodietro. Among other things I did not understand, but the EU can 'mandaremissioni in Tripoli, in time of the alleged civil war, without asking ilparere the Libyan government, which Gaddafi? Asked him for permission? Avra \u200b\u200b'not tell you'..?]

Meanwhile, Democratic Community in Italy's Libyan complaint the arrival in our country of a hundred agents of the regime of Gaddafi, who posing as students, are preparing to stage demonstrations delregime to the embassy in Rome and the Consulate in Milan. The Community gave to states have information that would give students the false aPerugia already.

[And here we have the final comic, all around you, a friend of the consumer mainstream stories . It adds texture to an imaginary community 'Democratic Libyan in Italy, a essersicostituita think tank that has in recent days (mica will escort the 100 to 80 € ormaiconvertite Islam?). These come to the rescue of the CDL popoloitaliano and warn are coming one hundred secret agents of the "regime" Libyan disguised as students to make protests InItalia! I mean, ' Let us realize ... but if you think Gaddafi had centoagenti secrets available to young and healthy, we will send afar in Italy on Sunday with marches and metalworkers piddini? But we're kidding? What has the revolution at home and in your opinion right now is concerned about asking his staff to wave placards in front of a palace in Milan? Wake up! Wake up! There would then be to understand how we would come to Perugia questilibici and decrypt the reason for which they are mentioned in Rome, Milan and Perugia. I doubt it is coincidental.]

But let the juice. Questoarticolo of the Republic, which I assume to be an editorial, and 'pure propaganda. As such, aisuoi times and for other reasons, the fund was Padellaro I carry 'ascribed questopezzo . pure propaganda. Propaganda . It 'clear?

Well, not 'here on the blogosphere we can remove them all, one by one, the articles of the Republic, delCorriere of Done and all the others. Ecchediamine!

take it in once and for all who are caciaballe treacherously from beginning to end.

E quit it.

TNEPD and ' HERE

Logo Monster Energy Belly Button Rings

But these Americans were never really united? The summary

An interesting speech allaRadio Satellite Iran in Italian writer Stefano Rings (aka John Kleeves ). The coordinates of the satellite radio, if ancoraesiste are: Hot Bird 3, 13 ° east, 12437 MHz, H. The interview, 7novembre released on 2004, says the U.S. presidential election just conclusesicon confirmation of outgoing President George W. Bush and touches on topics that definireattuali and 'a euphemism. In addition to inspiring the intuitive parallel Iraq-Libya that many observers have already 'stressed Kleeves scandaloLewinsky to mention that, according to him, the servants' Clinton hesitant to move a adinvadere Kosovo. Who remembers?
Kleeves closes interventocon a surprising statement: Bush has won better than Kerry (the Democratic candidate). Today, after the handover in 2008, it is surprising to notice to what was right.

Tell those who do not conoscessel'autore that Stefano Rings and 'died Sept. 18, 2010 unafreccia pierced by a crossbow . E 'was found at night in his auto.Sulla his death and not' suspect that a large and documentation and 'poor . Cisono however two versions about the incident. That official said that StefanoAnelli and 'crazy (sound familiar?) Paired her niece with a stick, pulled off an old crossbow his grandfather from above the fireplace and then e'suicidato puntandosela with him in the car in the race. That ' laversione Journal. Then there 'the other .



Here is the interview:

Stefano Rings (aka John Kleeves)
- Dr. Kleeves, how does the latest elezionistatunitensi?
First, from a technical standpoint, I'd say they have confirmed the essence oligarchicadegli USA. As always voted in the majority of the richest. Use it in voter turnout compared to the claimants (who are the largest of 18 years unless the mentally ill found and especially not those who have criminal subitocondanne of some importance, which are many) is now about 25-30% decenniassestata County elections , 30-35% in the elections of the States, and 50-55% in those federal elections that are also matched to the choice delPresidente. This time it was the last type is statoconfermato trend.
Lapopolazione the U.S. according to the census conducted in 2000 around ai280 million people, of whom about 75% over 18 years; gliaventi law are therefore approximately 210 million but were to have voted, according to figures circulating now, that will certainly correct in a little 'ditempo, 112.5 million equal to 53.5%. As in the media, maybe say nellamedia high, closer to 55% to 50 or even 49% in 1996. Sitratta then certainly the richest.
In the U.S. there are a very rich 25%, 25% of assolutamentepoveri (70 million people without health care, without lavorofisso without decent home - the homeless , that is, the homeless, are 4-5 million) and 50% with acceptable income , generally workers and employees: the level of participation at the polls, comemostrato by all statistics, are proportional to income, so the inmaggioranza County election vote practically the only band richer than those of state virtually is added to this the richest fifth dellafascia yield acceptable, adding that in federal elections with lapresidenza ballot arrives in the middle, more spare representations deimeno poor, with 70 million poor who continue to be almost absent deltutto.
Command therefore in elezioniUsa the hard core of the richest who always vote, beginning with the election of the County that are less publicized but even more important because Chesio appoint local charges poigestiranno all other electoral processes.
But what is truly significant, the subtlety that must davveroafferrare, that this is so poor and so selective turnout evolved from the system. They are put in place various measures, other Statoa state, some come to establish the polling stations in places such as pocoappetibili local municipal prison and basements. But the big delleesclusioni is achieved in two ways: by requiring the City Hall in specificaregistrazione as a voter - which expires in the absence of even two elezioniconsecutive - and do not require payment of lost time to go to votareda part of employers, which in fact did not pay him (as happened loscorso November 2, Business Day, on the other hand the elections maifissate not on Sundays). This excludes the case from 50 to 75% of aventiteoricamente law, this excludes the poorest. It 's a desired effect. U.S. Ipolitici complain every time the low turnout, but the fact is that if the voters are starting to show a consistentetendenza to vote en masse, then other measures would be taken to restore the electorate praticiaggiuntivi the number and composizionevoluta.
Insommaanche these elections have shown that in the U.S. in the mid and dellapopolazione passes, half passes and potentially poorer and more eager dicamba radical, is actually prevented from voting. Regarding gliesclusi from voting for judicial reasons, are not really as I said a few: negliUsa there are about 3.5 million and a number of prisoners paroled (house arrest) calculated between 2.5 and 4, 5 million, for a total ranging from 6 to 8 milionidi all private individuals by law the right to vote, if you calculate leloro families, who normally follow their destiny, we have nearly 20 million individuals officially excluded from public life, almost 20 million pariah.

- Quindinon is the only impediment to voting ...
There lapreselezione upstream of the parties. In the U.S. there are theoretically a trentinadi political parties, including a CommunistParty with U.S. headquarters in New York, but as you know you made the elezioniriescono to present only two parties only and always, always the same, and the Republican ilDemocratico. And they are two sides of the same coin, in which the duepartiti inevitably, to give the impression of a minimum dicompetizione of political ideas, divided the category of the rich. There sonodubbi that the Democratic Party and the Republican Party rappresentanoentrambi the rich: the Republican candidate in this election was GeorgeBush, oil rich Texas oil family, and candidatodemocratico was John Kerry, husband of Teresa Heinz, widow and heiress delmultimiliardario King of vinegar (vinegar Heinz), among other things, the deceased was unSenatore (not surprising since all but its all sonomiliardari U.S. Senators, as David Rockefeller and Ted Kennedy to fix the ideas). Anchequesto is an effect wanted: this is the result of a study of the electoral mechanism dellapresentazione parties, that to succeed devonoimpiegare super organization established and huge financial resources; nonc'e 'even hope to see him in contention, therefore, the Communist Party USA: ineffective is not even a real little parties, but an FBI office in disguise perschedare the suckers who sign up (but now does not do it any more).

- What is the final victory of Bush?
C'èinnanzitutto a cultural consideration to be done. A consideration culturalee also moral. Bush's victory is despite the fact that shortly before delleelezioni a study in the U.S. itself had revealed that U.S. attack on Iraq began its by Bush in March 2003 almeno100.000 had caused deaths among Iraqis, mostly civilians , namely women, bambiniecc. So it seems that the American electorate has forgiven Bush unacarneficina of such proportions, which becomes even more disturbing to our very conscience if you think that the U.S. is known that the attack on Iraq took place without any valid reason, and indeed is the case for sordid reasons, such as robbery Iraqi oil as well as attaining a position to make further assaults avanzateper robbery, perhaps against the neighboring Iran.Ebbene yes, the American electorate has canceled all its what GeorgeBush, told voters that he did not care about those deaths. It 's a tristeverità and is not new. The U.S. has so often been guilty diorrende massacres in the world but the American electorate has never battutociglio, so it was with the extermination of the Indians (Native Americans), with ibombardamenti of cities in WWII (World War II), with Japan atomichesul , with 4 million of civilian casualties caused in the War diCorea, with 6 million caused by the Vietnam, with 300,000 dellaprima Gulf War against Iraq ordered by Bush's father, and so on. In cases tuttiquesti the American electorate has decided that those massacres were perconquistare benefits for the U.S. that would have turned into vantaggiconcreti for him, even if small, for example, would have paid that nonetheless had to import bananas or here, just the oil . The problem Eche the U.S. electorate (in the sense that the electorate is to vote) is formed by grandemaggioranza WASP - WhiteAnglo Saxon Protestants, that is, white Anglo-Saxon and religioneprotestante - which are the dominant ethnic group, but are even for an ethnic group that Lesu historical events ha finito per assumere delle caratteristiche psicologichee culturali preoccupanti, pericolose per il resto dell’umanità: oltre allainestinguibile avidità e alla mancanza di altri valori essa infatti evidenziauna mancanza di sensibilità umana, una callosità, in poche parole unaspietatezza che sgomenta. Questa etnia è un problema per il mondo .

- Quindi qualè la valutazione politica della conferma di Bush?
E’ moltosemplice. Gli USA (that is, their leadership, their establishmentche we have seen the hard core of the electorate led dall'elitedegli ultra-rich, which would among other things, too diriferimento shareholders of U.S. multinationals from their foundation, but we say the U.S. perbrevità ) since their foundation perseguitooccultamente have always intended to dominate the world in order to exploit it, physically as well as humanly, to enslave . But sempretrovati have to have to do with powers stronger than themselves, so they do sempretrovato spontaneous part of the country democratic and virtuous isuoi eliminating opponents for high moral reasons (we have various slogans U.S. deivari periods of expansion: self-determination of peoples, Manifest Destiny, Making the world safe for democracy, America arsenal of democracy, etc.). In 1989, however, has disappeared the last of these Powers are stronger and gliUsa are faced with a choice: continue for at least qualchedecennio as before, expanding the influence gradually, or gettaredecisamente the mask, to show what has been , a power sanguinariae determined to enslave all at any cost, even with wars apertaaggressione and perhaps using nuclear weapons? After some years of hesitation, basically the first 6 of Clinton, the Establishment of the United States - whose elements are as tested'uovo Brezinski, Kissinger, Wolfowitz, etc. - decided condeterminazione for the second option: to throw the mask, grab the frustae begin to strike the planet, starting with the weakest. Negliultimi two years Clinton was persuaded to this by turning Lewinski scandal. It was powerful when the true unmodo through the threatened: osarebbe or went to war was fired by the ' impeachment. And Clinton said the war in Kosovo.

- ConGeorge W. Bush this strategy goes on ...
Bushha given the green light to ' autoattentato Twin Towers 11 / 9 / 2001 under which he had a fig leaf to occupy Afghanistan eIraq. Now, re-elected, will continue on the same street. One can only wonder Chisari the next to be attacked, and this may be viadel Iran for its oil but also to eradicate the Khomeini revolution hit the U.S. chetanto pride species (the dominant ethnic group in the U.S. èanche exceptionally vindictive, As already noted in 1834 Alexis deToqueville). We can only say that the world is much better than we siaancora George W. Bush and Kerry the new . Bush is brutal and the world nonha doubts about his intentions. Kerry instead - among others in the classic stiledemocratico - would certainly be most critical, would seek to involve something extra say the allies (NATO and others), and could mislead , say, public opinion .